← Back to Vertiva Resources

Executive Summary

No retrieval architecture, however well engineered, can produce a good answer from a bad document. Vertiva's platform is deliberately architected around that reality: ingestion, classification, and chunking are treated as first-class engineering problems with their own governance.

Retrieval Quality Has a Ceiling, and Data Sets It

Independent analysis of production RAG deployments finds that a large majority of retrieval failures — commonly cited around 80% — originate in the ingestion and chunking layer, not in the language model itself. Controlled studies changing only the chunking strategy have shown accuracy swings of twenty to seventy-plus percentage points.

Figures reflect published 2026 industry analyses of production RAG deployments; cited as general context, not as claims about any specific customer's results.

How Vertiva Engineers Data Quality by Construction

Federated Retrieval Hedges Against the Limits of Any One Method

Vertiva fans every query out across semantic, lexical, and knowledge-graph retrieval simultaneously. A chunking or embedding weakness in one modality doesn't automatically become a wrong answer — a different retrieval path frequently still finds the right context.

A Shared Responsibility, by Design

The Bottom Line

The data-onboarding workstream in every customer rollout includes an explicit source-data quality pass alongside the access-control validation it already performs. Customers who invest in ingestion hygiene at onboarding see compounding retrieval-quality benefits across the entire platform.